Top of Las Vegas

Las Vegas / About / How We Work
Our method

How we work.

In a city flooded with tourist-facing rankings, we filter on review volume and rating thresholds, so the 1,298 restaurants we surface have actually earned it.

9.9/10
The Insider Score Exceptional · Calibrated to Las Vegas · Rebuilt weekly · Never for sale
№ 01 · The metric

The Insider Score

Every restaurant we cover earns an Insider Score: a single number from 0 to 10, calibrated to this city, rebuilt every week, and never for sale. It is not a raw average of other sites' stars. It is our own trust-weighted, momentum-adjusted, editor-confirmed read of the full review record. It weighs three things.

01Track record

How highly a kitchen rates, across how many diners, over how long. A 4.9 built on three thousand reviews counts for far more than a 5.0 built on thirty.

02Consistency

Whether recent diners still agree with the long-term verdict. A room that holds its standard outranks one coasting on old goodwill.

03Distinction

What a kitchen does that its category does not. The editorial pass that separates a very good taco shop from the one worth crossing town for. This layer is human, and never for sale.

№ 02 · Inputs

The data

The inputs are the aggregate review record: ratings, review counts, hours, and operating status from Yelp, Google, and TripAdvisor, each used under its licensed terms. This is data journalism. We read what thousands of diners report over time, not one critic's single meal. No signal we use in a live ranking is more than 48 hours old.

A machine layer finds and scores candidates. A human layer confirms them and writes the editorial. Nothing on this site publishes without both passes.

№ 03 · The formula

The math

Trust-weighted rating

The rating is the main input, weighted by how much evidence stands behind it. A five-star room with thirty reviews gets pulled toward the city's average; a 4.9 with three thousand reviews holds its ground. It is the same Bayesian weighting IMDb uses for its Top 250: trust a rating in proportion to the sample size it is built on.

Momentum

Among rooms with similarly trusted ratings, the one with more sustained recent traffic edges ahead. It is a tiebreaker, not the main driver. A 4.5 with twelve thousand reviews cannot leapfrog a 4.9 with three thousand, but it can hold its own in the top ten.

The result is a list of restaurants that have both the rating to back it up and enough sample size to prove the rating is real, not a fluke.

№ 04 · Calibration

The scale

Insider Scores are calibrated per city. The highest-ranked room in Las Vegas anchors at 10.0, and everything below scales to that anchor. The three factors and their weights are identical across every city in the network; only the local anchor moves.

We do this because every city's dining scene has its own ceiling. Forcing one global scale would either flatten smaller markets into the sixes and sevens or inflate the biggest ones until every city looked the same. Per-city calibration tells the truer story: this is the best room in this town, ranked against the rooms it actually competes with. A 9.5 in Las Vegas is the best Las Vegas has. It is not a claim about any other city.

№ 05 · Independence

What we don't do

01
No auto-publishing.

Every list and guide is read by an editor before it goes live. The algorithm proposes; the desk decides.

№ 06 · Accountability

Corrections

Data ages. Restaurants close, change chefs, move rooms. If you spot an error, stale hours, a closed room, a factual mistake in a guide, email the desk and we will fix it. Substantive corrections are logged in the open: the Updated date on the guide changes, and the entry is revised. We do not silently edit published work.

№ 07 · The masthead

The desk

Algorithms surface the candidates. Editors decide what earns a place, and in what order. Here is who reads the lists.

Hal Brennan
Hal Brennan
Editor at Large

Hal covers the rooms that earn their reputation the hard way: the long-running kitchens, the specialists, the places Las Vegas quietly agrees on. His reviews start with the record and end with a reason to go.

June Park
June Park
Trends Editor

June tracks where Las Vegas is eating next: the openings, the formats, the rooms generating the conversation. She writes the trend pieces and the upscale guides, and she reaches the new places before the lines do.

Marisol Castañeda
Marisol Castañeda
Guides Editor

Marisol runs the dish-by-dish, neighborhood-by-neighborhood beat: the taquerias, the noodle counters, the working-tier rooms, and the best-of lists that send you somewhere specific. Her rankings start with the review record and end with a recommendation you can act on tonight.

Danny Ocampo
Danny Ocampo
South Valley Editor

Danny grew up in Henderson and covers the valley people actually live in: the strip-mall kitchens off Eastern, the family rooms in Green Valley, the Filipino and Hawaiian places that have fed this side of town for two decades. He writes the south valley beat the way locals eat it, on a Tuesday, without a reservation.

Unsigned analysis runs under a shared byline, the Top Rated Editorial Team. Signed work carries the editor's name.

Five rooms, every Friday.

The new opening, the sleeper the score just flagged, and the one room worth booking this week. Free.